Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The action is to recover damages arising from the alleged negligence of the defendant in failing to deliver two telegrams sent to the plaintiff's agents in San Francisco.
The plaintiff was constructing a power plant on the Stanislaus River in Tuolumne County. On October 10, 1906, it made an agreement with the Risdon Iron and Locomotive Works, of San Francisco, by which the plaintiff was given the option to close a contract with said Iron Works, within ninety days from said date, for the construction by said Iron Works of a part of the plant, consisting of an additional pressure line, known as…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Primrose v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Gardiner Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- People v. . McKaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- United States Telegraph Co. v. GildersleveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Van Riper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.