Legal Opinion

People v. Cannedy

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1969No. Crim. 4910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J. *

Defendants Travis and Timothy Cannedy 1 appeal from judgment of conviction after jury verdict of the felonies hereinafter set forth.

Questions Presented :

1. Should the court have instructed on lesser included offenses ?

2. Alleged error in admitting evidence of telephone calls by the probation officer.

3. Should all three defendants have been represented by one attorney?

4. Alleged prejudicial misconduct of prosecutor.

Defendants Travis and Timothy and Michael W[ayne Cannedy were charged: count one, violation of section 243 of the Penal Code (battery against a peace officer known to be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. People v. NeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Maynard v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API