Legal Opinion

People v. Lorraine

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1938No. Crim. 1635PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of abortion under the provisions of section 274 of the Penal Code. From the judgment which was accordingly rendered and from the order denying a new trial he has appealed.

It is contended the verdict and judgment are not supported by the evidence for the reason that the testimony of the prosecutrix, upon whom the crime was committed, is not sufficiently corroborated to meet the requirements of section 1108 of the Penal Code.- It is also asserted the court erred in receiving evidence of communications with the defendant over the telephone without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. Eastman v. MeansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Mayr v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. People v. HermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. MacEwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. MaloneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. SicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API