Legal Opinion

Boughner v. Bay City

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1909No. Docket No. 104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari to Bay; Collins, J. Case by Elizabeth Boughner against the city of Bay City for personal injuries. There was an order overruling a demurrer to the declaration, and defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Plaintiff’s declaration counts upon an injury sustained by her through a fall upon defendant’s sidewalk on June 7, 1907, alleging the service of the notice hereinafter contained on September 6, 1907. The defendant demurred to this declaration upon the ground that the notice alleged was not such as the law required. The *194demurrer being overruled, the defendant has brought the case here by certiorari under the provisions of Act No. 310, Pub. Acts 1905. This statute is a sufficient answer to plaintiff’s claim that certiorari does not lie in this case:

“ Section 1. Whenever in any action at law in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re LambrechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Davis v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Angell v. City of West Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Atherton v. Village of BancroftMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Davis v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. LowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Dolph v. NortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Board of Supervisors v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Keenan v. County of MidlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Keenan v. County of MidlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API