People v. De Camp
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Sessions, J. Floyd De Oamp was convicted of larceny, and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than two nor more than five years in the State house of correction and reformatory at Ionia.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, C. J.
Respondent was convicted of the crime of larceny. He asks us to set aside that conviction for several alleged errors (all of which he contends were committed by the trial court in denying his motion for a new trial) which we will state and consider.
*5351. Because Daniel James, a deputy sheriff, testified to a statement made by defendant’s wife which indicated defendant’s guilt. We think the trial judge properly answered this contention, and we adopt that answer. It is as follows:
“Testimony of the witness Daniel James, mentioned * * * in said motion, was not objected to at the time of its…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Helwig v. LascowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. BahodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Samberg v. Knights of the Modern MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Davis v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Person v. J. H. Worden Lumber & Shingle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.