Legal Opinion

Kutscheid v. Emerald Square Properties, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 2009No. A08-1620PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge. *

Appellant brought this rent-escrow action against respondents, alleging that respondents violated Minn.Stat. § 504B.215, subd. 2a(l), which requires notice to prospective tenants of the total utility cost for a single-metered residential apartment building for each month of the most recent calendar year when the landlord bills for utility charges separate from the rent. In this appeal from a judgment for respondents, appellant argues that respondents did not provide her with the information required by Minn.Stat. § 504B.215, subd. 2a, before she leased the property,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer PressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Semler v. KlangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. PriggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API