Legal Opinion

Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 2003No. C1-02-291PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellant teachers’ union, Education Minnesota Chisholm (“EMC”), petitioned the state Bureau of Mediation Services (“BMS”) for a clarification of an appropriate bargaining unit of employees of respondent Independent School District No. 695 (“the District”) in Chisholm, Minnesota. EMC claimed that the six Early Childhood Family Education (ECFE) instructors employed by the District should be included in EMC’s bargaining unit. The BMS ruled that ECFE instructors should not be included in the bargaining unit because they did not meet the definition of “public employees,”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State v. OrselloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. In Re the Welfare of A.A.E.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In Re the Welfare of J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Milner v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Hyatt v. Anoka Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API