Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Exide Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Johnson Controls, Inc. and Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. (collectively “Johnson Controls,” treated after this sentence as a singular noun) have asserted a number of claims against Exide Corporation (“Exide”) and three of its former officers: Arthur Hawkins, Alan Gauthier and Douglas Pearson. Each of Johnson Controls’ original Complaint and First Amended Complaint targeted Exide with a claim under the Robinson-Patman Act (15 U.S.C. § 13(c)) and with a state common law claim of tortious interference with prospective business…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Coastal Abstract Service, Inc. v. First American Title Insurance Company, John M. HollenbeckCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Flentye v. KathreinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. v. HuberDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. Parker-Hannifin Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Billy Goat IP LLC v. The Billy Goat Chip Company LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Catilina Nominees Proprietary Ltd. v. Stericycle, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.