Legal Opinion

Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Exide Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 25, 2001No. 00 C 3852PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Johnson Controls, Inc. and Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. (collectively “Johnson Controls,” treated after this sentence as a singular noun) have asserted a number of claims against Exide Corporation (“Exide”) and three of its former officers: Arthur Hawkins, Alan Gauthier and Douglas Pearson. Each of Johnson Controls’ original Complaint and First Amended Complaint targeted Exide with a claim under the Robinson-Patman Act (15 U.S.C. § 13(c)) and with a state common law claim of tortious interference with prospective business…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Coastal Abstract Service, Inc. v. First American Title Insurance Company, John M. HollenbeckCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Flentye v. KathreinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  2. Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. v. HuberDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. Parker-Hannifin Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. Billy Goat IP LLC v. The Billy Goat Chip Company LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Catilina Nominees Proprietary Ltd. v. Stericycle, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API