Legal Opinion

People v. Baranov

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1962No. Crim. 1488PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the crime of perjury (violation of Pen. Code, § 118), pursuant to a jury verdict of guilty as charged and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Facts

In general substance, the facts shown by the record before us are as follows.- Louis Barrack, with whom Baranov had been an associate in several business ventures, desired to buy a residence. A considerable number of judgments were outstanding against Barrack. Barrack selected a residence property and persuaded Baranov to consummate the purchase in Baranov’s name alone. This involved…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. RoubusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. People v. McRaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. MezaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API