Legal Opinion

People v. Morris

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1971No. Crim. 9069PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

Defendant Clarence Morris appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of perjury (Pen. Code, § 118).

The charge of perjury arose from a petition for habeas corpus filed by appellant during his incarceration at San Quentin Prison. In his petition appellant declared under penalty of perjury that Fred W. Gabourie, the attorney who represented him in the 1967. proceedings that resulted in his being sent to prison, had assured him that the sentencing judge, with the prosecutor’s concurrence, had agreed to give appellant no more than a six-month…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re SandelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. FusaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. GiminezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. Vela PradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. PenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API