People v. Roubus
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
Lucille Mae Roubus was charged with perjury. At the close of the prosecution’s case the court advised the jury to acquit her. (Pen. Code, § 1118.) Notwithstanding this advice, the jury returned a verdict of guilty. Defendant thereafter made a motion for a new trial on grounds (1) that, since there was no direct evidence of the falsity of her alleged perjured statement, the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence and (2) that “because of the advised verdict, she did not put on her defense.” The motion was granted, and the People appeal. (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. 3.)
At the trial in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. SarazzawskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. RobargeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Castro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Beckley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. HaldeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.