Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Weimer v. Ypparila

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1993No. 18205PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

American Concept appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to intervene as untimely. We reverse.

FACTS

Debra Barton Weimer (Weimer) filed suit against John Ypparila (Ypparila) seeking damages for bodily injury arising from a 1988 auto accident.

In 1992, Weimer first notified her under-insurance carrier, American Concept, of the accident and the pending lawsuit. American Concept acknowledged the letter and requested Weimer’s medical records and documents relating to the suit. American Concept also reserved its rights due to late notice from Weimer. American Concept…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Weber v. TschetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Erickson v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Linton ex rel. Arnold v. Commissioner of Health & EnvironmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Husfeldt v. WillmsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker v. AtkinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Meier v. McCordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Mergen v. Northern States Power Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Scammon Bay Association, Inc. v. UlakAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Burlington Northern Railroad v. GreenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API