Husfeldt v. Willmsen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLEMING, Judge.
Appellant Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau) filed a motion pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 24.01 and 24.02 to intervene as a party defendant in a suit by its insured against an underinsured tortfeasor. The trial court denied the motion to intervene, finding that Farm Bureau had preserved its subrogation rights and stood in the plaintiff’s shoes for purposes of pursuing a claim against the tortfeasor. The trial court further found that intervention by Farm Bureau as a party defendant was inappropriate under the circumstances. Farm Bureau appeals, claiming it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Norman v. RefslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Engelrup v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Erickson v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Allstate Insurance v. KarlWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Weimer v. YpparilaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- BE & K Construction Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.