Scammon Bay Association, Inc. v. Ulak
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
An employee was injured on the job and recovered workers’ compensation benefits from the employer. The employee then sued other potential tortfeasors. Under AS 23.30.015(g), the employer would normally have a lien on any money the employee recovered from other tortfeasors, up to the amount of benefits paid by the employer- to the employee. But in this case, the employee and the tortfeasors settled their dispute and agreed that the employer was twenty-five percent at fault for the accident, and proposed that the superior court hold a hearing and then…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States of America, and Ann Erwin, Intervening v. City of Chicago, William C. Bigby, and Ann Erwin, Intervening v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Banco Popular De Puerto Rico v. David Greenblatt, the Official Secured Creditors' Committee of Amfesco Industries, Inc., Etc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Hartford Insurance v. BirdsongCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- GILBERT M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Bridges v. Banner HealthAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Christopher J. White v. Lisa M. Johnson v. City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
- Hopper v. Estate of GoardAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.