Meier v. McCord
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this appeal we hold that the release of a tortfeasor does not preclude an injured party from pursuing underin-sured benefits from its insurance carrier. We also hold that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside a default judgment.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] On November 21, 1998, Anthony McCord failed to stop at a flashing red light and collided with another vehicle. Chad Meier, his passenger, was injured. It is undisputed that McCord’s negligence was the sole cause of the accident. Therefore, liability was not disputed. The parties do dispute the amount…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Hrachovec v. KaarupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- National Surety Corporation v. ShoemakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Clarke v. ClarkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Loewen v. Hyman Freightways, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Upper Plains Contracting Inc. v. Pepsi AmericasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Colton Lumber Co. v. SiemonsmaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Donald Bucklin Construction v. McCormick Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Lindblom v. Prime Hospitality Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Peters v. BARKER & LITTLE, INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.