Legal Opinion
Treiber v. Katz
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 5, 1992No. 2:91-cv-70374PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMORE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reinstate Section 10(b) claims dismissed by Order of this Court on September 25, 1991. At issue is the constitutionality of § 476 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act, Pub.L. No. 102-242, 105 Stat. 2387 (1991). 1 The Court finds that § 476, which adds § 27A to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, is unconstitutional as applied to this case. Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reinstate.
I
On January 22, 1991, Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging, inter alia, that Defendants’ offer…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Axel Johnson Inc. v. Arthur Andersen & Co., United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Johnston v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Cooperativa de Ahorro y Credito Aguada v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
- Arioli v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.