Legal Opinion
Axel Johnson Inc. v. Arthur Andersen & Co., United States of America, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 27, 1993No. 346, Docket 92-7624PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents a challenge to the constitutionality of Section 27A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78aa-1, as applied to reinstate plaintiff-appellee Axel Johnson Inc.’s (“Johnson”) claims under § 10(b) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 against defendant-appellant Arthur Andersen & Co. (“Andersen”), which had been dismissed as untimely under the regime of Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2773, 115 L.Ed.2d 321 (1991).
BACKGROUND
In a complaint filed in the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Silivanch v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Plyler v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- District of Columbia v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Johnston v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.