Legal Opinion
Arioli v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 2, 1992No. 87-70312PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S MAY 14, 1992 DECISION
GADOLA, District Judge.
On May 14, 1992, this court ruled on various issues concerning plaintiffs’ claims of securities fraud. Part of this court’s order dealt with the proper statute of limitations for claims of violations of Section 10(b) of the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)) and Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5).
This court calculated the statute of limitations by applying a recent amendment to the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act, Section 27A (15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. Sperry Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. McCoyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1994
- Gordon v. Western Steel Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Fortenberry v. Foxworth Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1993