Legal Opinion

Hafer v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided April 13, 2015No. Case Nos. 2:13-cv-02340-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02341-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02342-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02343-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02344-JTF-tmp, 2:13-cv-02345-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02346-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02347-JTF-tmp, 2:13-cv-02348-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02349-JTF-tmp, 2:13-cv-02350-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02351-JTF-tmp, 2:13-cv-02433-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02488-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02644-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02645-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02699-JTF-tmp, 2:13-cv-02706-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02709-JTF-dkv, 2:13-cv-02783-JTF-tmp, 2:13-cv-02861-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02862-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02864-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02865-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02866-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02868-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02869-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02870-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02871-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02872-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02873-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02883-JTF-cgc, 2:13-cv-02985-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02196-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02212-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02213-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02214-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02215-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02217-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02218-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02229-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02308-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02329-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02355-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02370-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02376-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02378-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02380-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02382-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02386-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02400-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02401-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02410-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02411-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02412-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02452-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02453-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02473-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02493-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02503-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02523-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02535-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02536-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02537-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02553-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02572-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02591-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02594-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02597-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02614-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02616-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02625-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02672-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02709-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02710-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02772-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02776-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02782-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02783-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02784-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02798-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02799-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02811-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02812-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02813-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02814-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02815-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02817-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02818-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02819-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02820-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02821-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02822-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02823-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02825-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02826-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02827-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02828-JTF-tmp, 2:14-cv-02829-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02830-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02831-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02832-JTF-tmp, 2:14-cv-02833-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02834-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv02835-JTF-tmp, 2:14-cv-02836-JTF-tmp, 2:14-cv-02837-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02838-JTF-tmp, 2:14-cv-02839-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02840-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02854-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02858-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-02921-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02922-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02935-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02941-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02942-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02943-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02944-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02945-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02952-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02953-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02954-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02955-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02956-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02957-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02973-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02974-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02975-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02980-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02981-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02982-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02993-JTF-cgc, 2:14-cv-02998-JTF-dkv, 2:14-cv-03001-JTF-cgc, 2:15-cv-02016-JTF-cgc, 2:15-cv-02017-JTF-cgc, 2:15-cv-02021-JTF-dkv, 2:15-cv-02041-JTF-cgc, 2:15-cv-02045-JTF-tmp, 2:15-cv-02054-JTF-cgcPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

JOHN T. FOWLKES, JR., District Judge.

Before the Court comes Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Master Complaint filed on May 30, 2014. (ECF No. 56).1 On June 30, 2014, Plaintiffs Kathleen Hafer, et al., filed their Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 57). Defendants filed a Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss on July 21, 2014. (ECF No. 59). To this date, Plaintiffs have filed several supplemental authorities in opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (ECF Nos. 61; 80-81). Additionally, Defendants have filed…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Walter Shuker v. Smith & Nephew PLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Aaron v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
  3. Warstler v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
  4. Carmine v. PoffenbargerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  5. Spier v. Coloplast Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API