Warstler v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
James G. Carr, Senior United States District Judge
ORDER
This is a products liability action against defendant Medtronic, Inc. (Medtronic). Plaintiff alleges that the Medtronic-manu-factured device implanted in his body was defective, causing him serious injuries. Plaintiff brings his claims pursuant to Ohio law.
Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Pending is defendant Medtronic’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has filed a response (Doc. 13) to which defendant has replied. (Doc. 14).
For the reasons that follow, I grant defendant’s motion.
Background
De…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arnold v. CooperSurgical, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Banet v. The Cooper Companies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
- Cline v. Medtronic IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Farson v. CooperSurgical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- Franks v. The Cooper Companies. Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.