Legal Opinion

Warstler v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 28, 2017No. Case No. 3:16CV00385PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James G. Carr, Senior United States District Judge

ORDER

This is a products liability action against defendant Medtronic, Inc. (Medtronic). Plaintiff alleges that the Medtronic-manu-factured device implanted in his body was defective, causing him serious injuries. Plaintiff brings his claims pursuant to Ohio law.

Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Pending is defendant Medtronic’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has filed a response (Doc. 13) to which defendant has replied. (Doc. 14).

For the reasons that follow, I grant defendant’s motion.

Background

De…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arnold v. CooperSurgical, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
  2. Banet v. The Cooper Companies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
  3. Cline v. Medtronic IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  4. Farson v. CooperSurgical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
  5. Franks v. The Cooper Companies. Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API