Legal Opinion

Walter Shuker v. Smith & Nephew PLC

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 1, 2018No. 16-3785PublishedCited by 270 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAUSE, Circuit Judge.

With the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, Congress added comprehensive medical device approval processes to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, prescribing tiers of federal requirements for certain devices corresponding to the device's inherent risk level. In exchange for compliance with the strictest federal mandates, Congress afforded manufacturers express preemption from state laws imposing different or additional "safety or effectiveness" requirements for those devices. 21 U.S.C. § 360k(a)(2). This case presents an issue of first impression among the Courts…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by270 opinions

  1. Plastic Surgery Center, P.A. v. Aetna Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  2. Candace Moyer v. Patenaude & FelixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. Air Evac EMS, Inc. v. Ted CheathamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. Alejandro Lupian v. Joseph Cory Holdings LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. Adrian Lupu v. Loan City LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

265 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API