Legal Opinion
Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Snelbaker
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 5, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 N.J. Super. 11 (1954)
109 A.2d 287
THE TEXAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILSON A. SNELBAKER AND RUTH L. SNELBAKER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 25, 1954.
Decided November 5, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.
Mr. James Hunter, III, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Archer, Greiner, Hunter & Read, attorneys).
Mr. Howard G. Kulp, Jr., argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille, attorneys).
Before us appellants contend they should be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hempstead v. Meadville Theological SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Katz v. FarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- R. H. McWilliams, Jr., Co. v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
- Hutchinson Box Board & Paper Co. v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Township of Teaneck v. MercerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BuckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- NJ Highway Authority v. CurrieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Englewood v. VEITH REALTY CO., INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Essex County Improvement Authority v. RAR Development AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Essex Cty. Imp. Auth. v. Rar Dev.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999