Legal Opinion

Township of Teaneck v. Mercer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 25, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, J.

The Township of Teaneck instituted, before Mr. Justice Bodine, proceedings under R. S. 20:1-1 et seq., to condemn the property of James Binkov and Eva Binkov, husband and wile, for park purposes. The proceedings moved regularly to the filing of the report by the commissioners in condemnation. Thereafter the township, by action of its governing body, resolved that the condemnation proceedings be abandoned, that the notice of lis pendens, filed in accordance with the statute, should be discharged and that “any costs, expenses and counsel fees of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bergen Co. Sewer Authority v. Bor. of Little FerryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Englewood v. VEITH REALTY CO., INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Essex County Improvement Authority v. RAR Development AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  4. Texas Pipe Line Co. v. SnelbakerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Essex Cty. Imp. Auth. v. Rar Dev.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API