Legal Opinion

Essex County Improvement Authority v. RAR Development Associates

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 1, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEISS, A.J.S.C.

I. Background

This matter is before the court on the return date of an Order to Show Cause as to why final judgment should not be entered that the plaintiff, Essex County Improvement Authority (“ECIA”), has duly exercised its power of eminent domain and, therefore, three disinterested commissioners should be appointed to determine the compensation to the defendant, RAR Development Associates (“RAR”), for the taking of its property interest.

On November 20, 1998, a Verified Complaint, a Declaration of Taking and a Lis Pendens was filed by ECIA and an Order to Show Cause was…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Weichert Co. Realtors v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. City of Trenton v. LenznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. BOROUGH OF GLASSBORO VS. JACK GROSSMAN (L-0075-18, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  2. Readington Tp. v. Solberg AviationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Tp. of West Orange v. 769 Associates, LLC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. Essex Cty. Imp. Auth. v. Rar Dev.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  5. MILLTOWN-FORD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API