Legal Opinion
State v. Buck
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 20, 1967PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
94 N.J. Super. 84 (1967)
226 A.2d 840
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THOMAS F. BUCK AND MARY P. BUCK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND ORANGE SAVINGS BANK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 28, 1966.
Decided February 20, 1967.
Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Richard Brian Young argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Sweeney and Young, attorneys).
Mr. Edward D. McKirdy, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- City of Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- City of Trenton v. LenznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Township of West Orange v. 769 Associates, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Township of West Orange v. 769 ASSOCIATES, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- STATE, BY STATE H. COMMR. v. Totowa Lum. & Sup. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- State v. Malibu Beach, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- CRDA v. BaninNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.