Legal Opinion
R. H. McWilliams, Jr., Co. v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided December 18, 1936PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed by the Chancellor in disposing of petitions for allowances for compensation for services claimed to have been rendered and expenses to have been incurred in connection with the receivership of Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Company.
The Chancellor:
Receivers were appointed by this court for Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Company, hereinafter referred to as Mokan, on March 18, 1932, on the ground of insolvency, under Section 3883 of the Revised Code of 1915.
The corporation was a holding company, its principal assets consisting of all the common capital stock, one thousand…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- In Re GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- In Re Paramount-Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- In re FelsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Maurer v. International Re-Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Tri State Mall Associates v. A. A. R. Realty Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1972
- DiSanto v. Dauphin Consolidated Water Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. WarrickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.