Legal Opinion

Tongass Sport Fishing Ass'n v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1994No. S-5202PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

This appeal concerns a regulation promulgated by the Alaska Board of Fisheries (the Board) allocating the number of chinook (king) salmon that may be harvested by commercial seiners and gillnetters, commercial trollers, and sport fishers in southeast Alaska. This appeal presents three questions. First, does the allocative regulation promulgated by the Board violate the policies expressed in Article VIII of the Alaska Constitution? Second, in promulgating this regulation, did the Board consider the relevant criteria and take a “hard look” at the salient problems…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. OstroskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Alaska Survival v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Kenai Peninsula Fisherman's Cooperative Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Nielson v. BentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ramsey v. City of Sand PointAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Jackinsky v. JackinskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Smith v. StaffordAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API