County of Sutter v. Tisdale
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The district attorney of Sutter County brought the present action, under the direction of the board of supervisors of that county, to procure by condemnation the right of way for a public road that the board of supervisors had determined should be laid out over the lands of the defendants. The action was tried by the court without a jury, and upon its findings of fact judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff. The present appeal is from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
At the trial the plaintiff introduced in evidence a petition to the board of supervisors to lay out the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Humboldt Cty. v. DinsmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- County of Siskiyou v. GamlichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Levee Dist. No. 9 v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- County of Sutter v. McGriffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- County of Sonoma v. CrozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- County of San Luis Obispo v. SimasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- County of Madera v. Raymond Granite Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- County of Santa Barbara v. YatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910