County of Sonoma v. Crozier
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of tbe County of Sonoma. R. F. Crawford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is a proceeding to condemn a strip of land for a private way, and the ease is presented on a demurrer to the complaint. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendant did not answer. Judgment went against him, and he now appeals, resting on his demurrer.
The complaint avers the filing of a sufficient petition and the giving and approval of the bond, and that afterward such proceedings were had that on the ninth day of October, 1895, the board of supervisors of said county, by order drdy given and made, directed the district attorney, etc.
The complaint fails to state: .1. That viewers were…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- County of Siskiyou v. GamlichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Los Angeles County v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- People v. Buellton Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- County of Sutter v. McGriffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Glenn County v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Graham v. BailardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.