Ramey v. Myers
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
Appellant Heffernan is the assignee of a money judgment. He appeals from an order compelling its satisfaction. The order thus brought under review was granted upon motion made by defendant Myers pursuant to section 675 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The judgment which appellant acquired by assignment was entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs Ramey and against the eodefendants Myers and Buckley. The theory of the motion to compel satisfaction was as follows: (a) The judgment was recovered upon a cause of action ex delicto. sounding in fraud; (b) appellant in acquiring title to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grainger v. AntoyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Savage v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Adams v. White Bus LineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Waller v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crummer v. BeelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bergloff v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Whitson v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Tevis v. BeigelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Seneca Insurance v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.