Legal Opinion
Dyck O'Neal, Inc. v. Wynne
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 21, 1999No. AC 18927PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FREEDMAN, J.
The defendant in this foreclosure action appeals from the judgment of the trial court, correcting an error in the name of the substitute plaintiff. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. On April 3, 1995, Manhattan Savings Bank obtained a judgment of strict foreclosure on certain property owned by the defendant, Mary Beke Wynne, in New Haven. Title to the property vested in Manhattan Savings Bank on May 11,1995. Manhattan Savings Bank subsequently filed a motion for deficiency judgment against the defendant. On July 3,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kim v. MagnottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Andover LP I v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Motiejaitis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- America's Wholesale Lender v. PaganoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Coldwell Banker Manning Realty, Inc. v. Cushman & Wakefield of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Franco v. East Shore Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- America's Wholesale Lender v. SilbersteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Greco Construction v. EdelmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.