Legal Opinion
Franco v. East Shore Development, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 26, 2004No. SC 16893PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The sole issue raised by this certified appeal is whether an assignee of an arbitration award has a right to intervene in an action to confirm that award brought by a party to the arbitration agreement pursuant to General Statutes § 52-417.1 During the pen*625dency of an arbitration proceeding between the plaintiff, Donald L. Franco, and the defendant, East Shore Development, Inc. (East Shore), East Shore assigned all its right, title and interest in any arbitration award to the appellant, Laurel Woods, Inc. (Laurel Woods). The arbitrator thereafter rendered an award in favor of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- New England Pipe Corp. v. Northeast Corridor FoundationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Washington Trust Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- City of Hartford v. Local 308Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Eisenberg v. TuchmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Machado v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Altavista Investments, LLC v. MakeevaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Cohen v. Dept. of Energy & Environmental ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.