Legal Opinion

Munoz v. Orr

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided February 8, 1983No. Civ. A. SA-82-CA-226PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SESSIONS, Chief Judge.

On this date came on to be considered Defendant Verne Orr’s motion to dismiss and strike, Plaintiff’s memorandum of law in opposition to said motion and Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s opposition. After a consideration of said pleadings, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss and strike.

Defendant makes three requests for dismissal. First, Defendant asserts that, because Plaintiff makes a claim of discrimination in his federal employment, Title VII is his exclusive remedy. Thus, Defendant asks that Plaintiff’s causes of action arising under the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lage v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1984
  2. Rezza v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API