Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mount Carmel Health v. Forte

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1992No. 92-631PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant does not dispute that the physical restrictions placed on claimant by Drs. Seeder and Stigliano are inconsistent with her nurse’s aide duties. She cannot, therefore, return to her former position of employment. State ex rel. Evans v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 116, 22 OBR 196, 489 N.E.2d 792. It is her residual capacity for sedentary work that anchors appellant’s challenge. Because she retains that ability, appellant maintains that claimant’s earning capacity has not been diminished. Appellant alternatively argues that any potential impairment is unrelated to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. CPC Group v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Lawrence v. American Lubricants Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Loral Systems Group v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State ex rel. Evans v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Evenflo Juvenile Furniture Co. v. HinkleOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Belknap v. Buehler's Food Markets, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State Ex Rel. Horsley v. Conrad, Unpublished Decision (10-24-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Belknap v. BuehlerÆs Food Markets, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API