Legal Opinion
International Harvester Co. v. Killefer Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1933No. 6712PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORCROSS, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit for injunction, for an accounting of profits and for damages. From a decree in favor of defendants, the plaintiff has appealed.
Appellant is the owner of what is known as the Wame patent, No. 1,517,659, covering certain improvements in the operation of a tractor propelled tandem disk harrow. The court below found that the harrow manufactured by defendants appellees “is substantially illustrated by the patent issued to Robert Killefer, No. 1,619,208.” As a conclusion of law the court held “that the harrows so manufactured by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McCormick v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Kokomo Fence MacHine Co. v. KitselmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Capri Jewelry Incorporated and Tancer & Two, Inc. v. Hattie Carnegie Jewelry Enterprises, Ltd., and Bill G. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Great Lakes Carbon Corporation v. Continental Oil CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Magnavox Co. v. Hart & RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Mason Corp. v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Air Devices, Inc. v. Air Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.