Legal Opinion

Magnavox Co. v. Hart & Reno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1934No. 7283, 7284PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

' Three suits on three patents, brought by the same plaintiff, the appellant herein, against ten defendants, the appellees, are presented to us for consideration on two appeals. Because of the interrelationship of interests and of subject-matter, we are passing upon both appeals jointly.

All three actions involve alleged infringement of the appellant’s patents, which in terms cover telephone electrodynamie and amplifying receivers, but which the appellant asserts apply to “the so-called 'loudspeakers’ commonly used in public address work and in connection with radio…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  2. Schnitzer v. California Corrugated Culvert Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  3. Simons v. Davidson Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Mason Corp. v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. Lanyon v. M. H. Detrick Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API