Legal Opinion

Hale v. Hale

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1935No. Civ. 5337PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COATS, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife and were divorced by a final decree of divorce on April 2, 1918. The interlocutory decree was made and entered on March 20, 1917. By these decrees the plaintiff was awarded the custody of the minor children of the marriage, namely, Ezli Hale, hereinafter referred to as Robert Hale, Grace Hale and Earl Hale; and defendant was ordered to pay to plaintiff for the support of herself and said children the sum of $45 per month.

On December 6, 1932, plaintiff presented to the court an affidavit for the purpose of procuring a writ of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Tremper v. TremperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Clavey v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Ordway v. ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. McHan v. McHanIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Codorniz v. CodornizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Haseltine v. HaseltineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API