Legal Opinion

Tremper v. Tremper

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1918No. Civ. Nos. 2518, 2533PublishedCited by 46 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order allowing alimony pending appeal. George E. Church, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

STURTEVANT, J., pro tem.

This case involves two appeals. The first (No. 2518) is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of divorce awarding permanent maintenance to the wife, and, the second (No. 2533) is an appeal from an order made after judgment awarding and increasing alimony pending the first appeal. We will consider them in the order stated.

1. The husband brought an action for divorce and the wife answered and filed a cross-complaint. Judgment went for the wife on her cross-complaint; the husband appealed, and has brought up the record under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Beadleston v. . BeadlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Gay v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Gaston v. GastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Reynolds v. ReynoldsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lopez v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  3. Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Borchert v. BorchertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API