Legal Opinion

Mattson v. Mattson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1919No. L. A. No. 4910PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Howard A. Peairs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This action was brought in the superior court of Kern County by the plaintiff against the defendant, her husband, for maintenance and support both pendente lite and permanent, counsel fees and costs. After the defendant had interposed a demurrer and a motion to strike out, which were allowed by the court, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, to which defendant demurred and moved to strike out certain portions thereof. The demurrer to the amended complaint and motion to strike out were denied, whereupon the defendant filed an answer and a cross-complaint in which he asked for a divorce…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. McFarland v. HolcombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hiner v. HinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Durfee v. SealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Moore v. MoffattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mueller v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Stephens v. StephensIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Allerton v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API