Legal Opinion

Allerton v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1929No. Docket No. 3652PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIELDS, J., pro tem.

This is an action on a bond of indemnity given under the following circumstances: The defendant, John F. King, was employed as a fireman and laborer in the operation of a steam shovel, owned and operated by the brothers H. D. Allerton and D. F. Allerton. The Allertons failed to pay King for his labor, and on or about July 8, 1925, King began an action against them in the justice’s court in the county of Los Angeles for the sum of $296. In this action he procured a writ of attachment which was duly levied upon the steam shovel owned by the defendants therein. The writ was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pacific Factor Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Amestoy v. Elec. Rapid Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Burns v. ScooffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Mattson v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Irwin v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Keenan v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Free v. Republic InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Hill v. WratherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. People v. Buellton Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API