Legal Opinion

Parker v. Tomm

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 20, 1920No. 9544PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Superior Court, . Muskogee County; H. 0. Thurman, Judge. Action by Mittie Parker against L. E. Tomm and others. Judgment for defendant named, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This was an action instituted originally in the superior court of Muskogee county, state of Oklahoma, by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against this defendant in error and Walter Watson and wife, as defendants, by petition in which the plaintiff alleged that she was the owner of the equitable title and in possession of the premises in controversy, the same being a city lot in tbe city of Muskogee, Okla.; that theretofore the defendants Watson had purchased from códefendant, L. E. Tomm, the premises in controversy and had executed back to the said Tomm certain promissory notes secured…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Crump v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. City of Tulsa v. PurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. YinglingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Armstrong v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. McAllister v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Interstate Bldg. & Loan Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API