Legal Opinion
Numano v. Vicario
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 27, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order dated September 16, 1994 affirmed, with $10 costs.
*458Landlord’s notice of nonrenewal in this owner occupancy holdover proceeding stated, inter alia: "[T]he undersigned Landlord does not intend to renew said lease because the Landlord intends to occupy [the] apartment * * * for Landlord’s personal use and occupancy as Landlord’s primary residence in the City of New York, and for the use and occupancy of Landlord’s wife and daughter as their primary residence in the City of New York.”
Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR) § 2524.2 (b) requires that every notice to a tenant to…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Teichman v. CiapiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1994
- Dominguez v. CorniellAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1990
4Cited by3 opinions
- McGoldrick v. DeCruzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2003
- Giancola v. MiddletonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008
- Isdahl v. PoglianiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008