Legal Opinion

Dominguez v. Corniell

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 2, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Final judgment entered February 14, 1989 affirmed, with $25 costs.

This is a holdover proceeding to evict a rent-stabilized tenant whose lease was not renewed upon the ground of owner occupancy. The apartment was sought because peti*298tioner Dominguez (who had recently reconciled with his wife) required tenant’s three-bedroom apartment for the use of himself, his wife and their two children. The record is sufficient to support the trial court’s finding that petitioner was proceeding in good faith and that the matter was not retaliatory in nature. The fact that there was…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kaycee West 113th Street Corp. v. DiakoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. First Sterling Corp. v. ZurkowskiNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Berlinrut v. LeventhalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Numano v. VicarioAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995
  2. Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Teichman v. CiapiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API