Legal Opinion

Teichman v. Ciapi

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order dated May 24, 1993 reversed, with $10 costs, respondent's motion to dismiss the petition is denied, the petition is reinstated, and respondent is granted leave to conduct disclosure.

Antecedent to commencement of this "owner use” holdover proceeding (Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2524.4 [a]), landlords served a notice of nonrenewal, or termination notice (Rent Stabilization Code § 2524.2), as follows: "As you already know my husband and I plan to move to 259 West 90th and make the garden apartment our retirement home. Your present lease which expires on October…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGoldrick v. DeCruzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2003
  2. Numano v. VicarioAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995
  3. Smilow v. UlrichCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
  4. Tze Hao Yen v. RamosAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API