Legal Opinion

Giancola v. Middleton

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided August 19, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order affirmed without costs.

In this owner-occupancy holdover proceeding (see Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2524.4 [a]), landlords’ notice of nonrenewal stated, in relevant part:

“[0]ne of the Landlord/Owners [ ] seeks to recover possession of the premises involved for the personal use and occupancy of the premises involved by a member of the Landlord/Owner’s immediate family as their primary residence in the City of New York. Specifically, the underlying facts concerning the Landlord/Owner’s desire to recover possession of the premises involvedf ] include,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Domen Holding Co. v. AranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Pultz v. EconomakisNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Numano v. VicarioAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hirsch v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API