Legal Opinion
McGoldrick v. DeCruz
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 31, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered on or about August 15, 2002 reversed, with $10 costs, motion denied and petition reinstated.
The notice of nonrenewal underlying this owner occupancy holdover proceeding informed the tenant, inter alia, that the landlord “maintains a good faith and honest intention and desire which is actual and genuine to regain possession” of the rent-stabilized apartment “for the use and occupancy of the Owner/Landlord as the primary residence of an immediate family member, to wit: her daughter,” and that the subject East 72nd Street building premises “is the only property…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- City of New York v. ValeraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Teichman v. CiapiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1994
- Numano v. VicarioAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- 1346 Park Place HDFC v. WrightAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- Giancola v. MiddletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- University Towers Associates v. GibsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 2007
- 1346 Park Place HDFC v. WrightAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- 71st St.-Lexington Corp. v. FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.