Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Crandall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2008No. 2008AP570-DPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. In this matter we review whether discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Minnesota in December 2007 should be imposed against Attorney Eric L. Crandall.

¶ 2. Attorney Crandall was admitted to the practice of law in this state in September 1991. He currently maintains a law practice in New Richmond.

¶ 3. Attorney Crandall has been the subject of professional discipline in this state on two prior occasions. As will be discussed more fully below, Attorney Crandall received a three-month suspension in February 2006 as discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the Supreme…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Flynn v. Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Fiedler v. Wisconsin SenateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re Integration of the BarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against CrandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Schuyler File v. Jill KastnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. ButlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API