Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. Crandall
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 2015No. 2014AP002487-DPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the report filed by Referee James G. Curtis, adopting two stipulations between the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Eric L. Crandall. The referee agreed that Attorney Crandall committed five counts of misconduct, as alleged in the OLR's complaint. The referee further agreed with the parties that a public reprimand was an appropriate level of discipline for Attorney Crandall's misconduct. Finally, the referee recommended that Attorney Crandall should be assessed the full costs of the proceeding, which are $4,182.17 as of September 17, 2015.
¶ 2. After careful review…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NussbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against ScanlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John R. DadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gerald P. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gerald P. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.