Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Crandall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2011No. 2008AP570-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Attorney Eric L. Crandall filed an appeal from the referee's report and recommendation that his license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for a period of five months and that he be required to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding.

¶ 2. This is the second opinion regarding this disciplinary proceeding. The complaint filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) contained both reciprocal discipline counts (Counts 8 and 9) and "standard" counts that related to alleged misconduct that was not the subject of discipline in another jurisdiction (Counts 1 through 7).

*701¶ 3.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. SmytheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. SmytheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In RE MARRIAGE OF RAZ v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API