Flynn v. Department of Administration
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.
¶1. The power of this court to declare invalid duly enacted legislation is an awesome one. It is a power that is largely unchecked, most always final. If we are to maintain the public's confidence in the integrity and independence of the judiciary, we must exercise that power with great restraint, always resting on constitutional principles, not judicial will. We may differ with the legislature's choices, as we did and do here, but must never rest our *529decision on that basis lest we become no more than a super-legislature. Our form of government provides for one legislature, not two. It is for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Maurin v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.